DOCUMENTS: Responses to the FEC
By krempasky Posted in FEC — Comments (8) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
As more groups weigh in before tomorrow's deadline, I'll keep updating this post with as many comments as I can get a hold of. They make for interesting reading - especially the tensions between the different organizations and viewpoints. We'll host the .pdf files as well as html versions to encourage discussion.
- The Online Coalition, on behalf of bloggers, decidely anti-regulation. Includes a request for the media exemption for bloggers:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Institute for Politics, Democracy, & the Internet, George Washington University. Advocates broad reform of campaign finance rules, much of which cannot be done without Congress. Strongly opposes blanket media exemption for bloggers:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Center for Individual Freedom, generally anti-regulatory, raises good concerns about definitions and restrictions on email communications:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Bob Bauer, Perkins-Coie, the FEC has choices, they need to regulate as little as possible, their current NPRM uneccesarily complicates, well - everything. Also, the Commission should issue a Statement of Policy that would express its deregulative commitment:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Democracy21, Campaign Legal Center, and the Center for Responsive Politics, arguably the most important comment submitted to the FEC, they make attempt to appear pro-blogger, but with many caveats:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Joe Birkenstock, practicing Democratic election attorney, largely focuses on disclaimer requirements:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Markos Moulitsas, Matt Stoller, & Duncan Black, an outstanding comment authored by Adam Bonin that took some extra time to respond specifically to some of the reformers' filings:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- English First, I admit I haven't had a chance to read their comment yet, please weigh in on the comment thread:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- OMB Watch, comments authored by former FEC Commissioner Karl Sandstrom:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Center for Democracy & Technology, Clearly John Morris and Leslie Harris hate me since they filed a 49-page comment. Needless to say, I've not read it - although I predict they accurately reflect their very sensible and pro-freedom statement of principles:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Professor Glenn Reynolds, Instapundit. "I can imagine few more effective ways of diminishing public regard for the political process than declaring unfettered political speech the domain of a narrow guild of favored professionals.":
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Gun Owners of America:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Henry Copeland, BlogAds.com, Henry provides some crucial data to the discussion:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- James Madison Center for Free Speech, as the name would imply:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- Republican National Committee, I'm very interested to read the RNC's take, but have not had the chance:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
- BCRA Co-Sponsors, And now come the reformers themselves:
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/pdf_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
src="http://www.redstate.org/images/firefox_icon.gif" hspace=2 vspace=2 width=25 border=0>
« Financing the General Election — Comments (6) | Do You Blog At The Office? — Comments (4) »
DOCUMENTS: Responses to the FEC 8 Comments (0 topical, 8 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Hmm...we've not had the come up yet! We have images turned off in the diaries for prudential reasons, but if you want to send me a .zip file we can probably get them up on our server.
Many thanks!
can always be sent to me, at the email address clayton at redstate.
Think I sent this to the right place, but let me make sure.
mkrempasky@geemail.com is the email? No need to .zip as these files are made for web and very small.
Mike, you've done such great work as an activist on all this, and in compiling this information today.
Now, let's win this.
my comment is here:
http://ballots.blogspot.com/2005/06/fec-comments-draft-101-am.html
the gop national committee's coments are here:
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=48357
It's -not- too late.
While the official comment period has closed, late comments continue to be received. The FEC is not required to respond to late comments, but they are free to do so. Late comments probably won't be posted to the FEC website.
So let's keep at it.

I know this is off subject, but I wanted to ask where I would post new graphics made for RS from some supporters?
Thanks.
P.S.
Been watching your info for the last few weeks on this. Doing a good job with this FEC thing